Anyway, I’ve been thinking about the relatively
infamous session of the select committee where David Davis said the dog had
eaten his homework when asked what the
cost to the UK would be of leaving the EU without any sort of deal. He, sort
of, admitted that crashing out in this way would mean, amongst other issues, loss
of passporting rights for financial institutions, loss the European health
card, open skies as well as a range of tariffs on goods and services. All things
that would hurt us, but, you know… #takebackcontrol
His excuse to the teacher was that he needed to
consider department by department, industry by industry what the impact could
be and how it could be mitigated. One example of such mitigation was the a new
computer system would be able to authorise goods moving across borders in a
matter of seconds, not days or weeks as might otherwise happen, which to some
companies would off-set any issue of tariffs which would also be imposed.
I see his point, I’m sure it would help and
might even make the difference when it comes to a 10% additional tariff to sell
into the EU. Would it against a 30-40% tariff as agriculture would get hit
with? I don’t know, I don’t run my own international business, but it seems
like a much larger hurdle to offset.
So how else could the Government mitigate these
tariffs?
Something along the lines of the Government
rolling out the lower corporation tax regime they are touting? The idea of
lowering it would be to help attract companies to set up here and offset the
tariffs raised from being outside the single market. A low rate also aims to
reduce the benefit of legitimately avoiding paying tax. Apparently
lowering tax rates, and presumably being consistent about their level into the
future, increases the tax you receive as companies and people pay fewer
accountants to find schemes to shelter their income from the taxman. The UK
corporation tax level is currently 19% - too low, too high? Who knows, lower it
further could see an increase, or it could start to reduce the tax take if it’s
currently at the right level.
The other fiscal levers the government can pull
is personal tax rates. They’ve already raised the tax free rate to £11.5k pa
and you can stick £20k into an ISA.
There was a promise in the 2015 general election to raise the level
where you pay the higher rate to £50k, though I imagine that might get lost in
the upcoming manifesto.
If the government lower tax rates for the rich
to incentivise them to stay in the same way as for companies, then the issue is
what happens when the next recession occurs? Unemployment is very low,
participation rates are really pretty high, tax rates are low and potentially
going lower, but the deficit isn’t forecast to be gone for another few years.
If something were to trigger a recession in those
next few years, like, I don’t know, a botched negotiation by May, then how does
the government stimulate without borrowing massively? What other levers are
there to pull – interest rates, not at the moment, cutting taxes, apparently not,
more government austerity, after 7yrs, seems unlikely to be successful. So they
would have to borrow and spend, currency goes down further, inflation goes up
more, but if taxes have to rise it removes the incentive for international
companies to base themselves here anyway further reducing the tax take.
The UK leaving the EU might not trigger a
recession by itself, it could even see the wonderful outcomes promised by team
Leave… but it won’t mean there won’t ever be another recession, and to pretend
otherwise makes you Gordon Brown. To go ahead with a hard Brexit and the fiscal
measures and mitigation which have been hinted at in order to retain competitiveness
is, on present course, leaving very little room for manoeuvre for when the next
downturn comes.
To get a decent deal with the EU, whilst being
able to trade freely with the rest of the world will require a level of skill
in negotiation and diplomacy which seems utterly beyond the current government
on current performance.
No comments:
Post a Comment